Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:25:33 +0200 checkheads: check successors for new heads in both missing and common
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:25:33 +0200] rev 17548
checkheads: check successors for new heads in both missing and common A relevant obsolete marker may have been added -after- we previously exchanged the changeset. We have to search for remote heads that disappear by the sole fact of pushing obsolescence. This case will also happen when remote got the new version from a repository that does not propagate obsolescence markers.
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:52:45 +0200 checkheads: attend to phases when computing new heads with obsolete
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:52:45 +0200] rev 17547
checkheads: attend to phases when computing new heads with obsolete Checkheads was more permissive than expected. When the remote heads are public we don't need to search for successors. None will make a public head disappear.
Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:35:05 +0200 test: add testing of checkheads behavior with obsolete
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:35:05 +0200] rev 17546
test: add testing of checkheads behavior with obsolete Expected behavior is quite complex. Explicit testing with clear scenarios is welcome.
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:33:10 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:33:10 -0500] rev 17545
merge with stable
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:59:21 -0300 i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with f5e86b416e05 stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:59:21 -0300] rev 17544
i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with f5e86b416e05
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:56:23 -0300 merge with i18n stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:56:23 -0300] rev 17543
merge with i18n
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip