Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:46:21 +0100] rev 51410
phases: leverage the collected information to record phase update
Since the lower level function already gather this information, we can directly
use it.
This comes with a small change to the test that are actually fixing them. The
previous version over-reported some phase change that did not exists. In both
case, we are force revision `1` to be secret and `0` remains draft`, the
previous code wrongly reported `0` as moving to secret while it properly
remained draft in the repository.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:41:09 +0100] rev 51409
phases: large rewrite on retract boundary
The new code is still pure Python, so we still have room to going significantly
faster. However its complexity of the complex part is `O(|[min_new_draft, tip]|)` instead of
`O(|[min_draft, tip]|` which should help tremendously one repository with old
draft (like mercurial-devel or mozilla-try).
This is especially useful as the most common "retract boundary" operation
happens when we commit/rewrite new drafts or when we push new draft to a
non-publishing server. In this case, the smallest new_revs is very close to the
tip and there is very few work to do.
A few smaller optimisation could be done for these cases and will be introduced in
later changesets.
We still have iterate over large sets of roots, but this is already a great
improvement for a very small amount of work. We gather information on the
affected changeset as we go as we can put it to use in the next changesets.
This extra data collection might slowdown the `register_new` case a bit, however
for register_new, it should not really matters. The set of new nodes is either
small, so the impact is negligible, or the set of new nodes is large, and the
amount of work to do to had them will dominate the overhead the collecting
information in `changed_revs`.
As this new code compute the changes on the fly, it unlock other interesting
improvement to be done in later changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:49:21 +0100] rev 51408
phases: fast path public phase advance when everything is public
Everything is already public, so we have nothing to do here.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:24:22 +0100] rev 51407
phases: fast path retract of public phase
There are no boundary to retract, so lets do nothing.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:40:13 +0100] rev 51406
phases: keep internal state as rev-num instead of node-id
Node-id are expensive to work with, dealing with revision is much simple and
faster.
The fact we still used node-id here shows how few effort have been put into
making the phase logic fast. We tend to no longer use node-id internally for
about ten years.
This has a large impact of repository with many draft roots. For example this
Mozilla-try copy have ½ Million draft roots and `perf::unbundle` see a
significant improvement.
### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-zstd-sparse-revlog
# benchmark.name = hg.perf.perf-unbundle
# bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = no-rust
# bin-env-vars.hg.py-re2-module = default
# benchmark.variants.
issue6528 = disabled
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-1
before:: 1.746791 seconds
after:: 1.278379 seconds (-26.82%)
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-10
before:: 3.145774 seconds
after:: 2.103735 seconds (-33.13%)
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-100
before:: 3.487635 seconds
after:: 2.446749 seconds (-29.85%)
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-1000
before:: 5.007568 seconds
after:: 3.989923 seconds (-20.32%)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:40:08 +0100] rev 51405
phases: do filtering at read time
This remove the need for the `filterunknown` method at all.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:38:01 +0100] rev 51404
phases: always write with a repo
In the future change that move the internal representation of phase-roots from
node-id to rev-num, we will use a repository to translate revision numbers back
to node at write time.
Since that future change is quite complicated already, we do this small API
change beforehand.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:18:15 +0100] rev 51403
phases: mark `phasecache.phaseroots` private
We are about to change its content from nodeid to revnum. So anyone directly
using the content might be in unexpected troubles. We start by making it private
to explicitly break any such user (and discourage them to do so).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:17:54 +0100] rev 51402
phases: check secret presence the right way during discovery
There is an official function for this, lets use it.
This will prevent the code to break in the future while we refactor the phase
code.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:21:18 +0100] rev 51401
phases: explicitly filter stripped revision at strip time
Explicit is better than implicit. The current logic is bit subtle and fragile.
It also get in the way of using something else than node-id as internal storage.
We replace it with a more explicit filtering while striping.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 04:26:03 +0100] rev 51400
debug: add a debug::unbundle command that simulate the unbundle from a push
The code have different behavior when the unbundle comes from a push, so we
introduce a command that can simulate such unbundle.
For our copy of mozilla-try-2023-03-22, this make the unbundle jump from 2.5
seconds (with `hg unbundle`) to 15 seconds (with `hg debug::unbundle`).
That 15 seconds timings is consistent with the issue seen in production.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:28:01 +0100] rev 51399
perf: support --template on perf::phases