phases: leverage the collected information to record phase update Since the lower level function already gather this information, we can directly use it. This comes with a small change to the test that are actually fixing them. The previous version over-reported some phase change that did not exists. In both case, we are force revision `1` to be secret and `0` remains draft`, the previous code wrongly reported `0` as moving to secret while it properly remained draft in the repository.

phases: large rewrite on retract boundary The new code is still pure Python, so we still have room to going significantly faster. However its complexity of the complex part is `O(|[min_new_draft, tip]|)` instead of `O(|[min_draft, tip]|` which should help tremendously one repository with old draft (like mercurial-devel or mozilla-try). This is especially useful as the most common "retract boundary" operation happens when we commit/rewrite new drafts or when we push new draft to a non-publishing server. In this case, the smallest new_revs is very close to the tip and there is very few work to do. A few smaller optimisation could be done for these cases and will be introduced in later changesets. We still have iterate over large sets of roots, but this is already a great improvement for a very small amount of work. We gather information on the affected changeset as we go as we can put it to use in the next changesets. This extra data collection might slowdown the `register_new` case a bit, however for register_new, it should not really matters. The set of new nodes is either small, so the impact is negligible, or the set of new nodes is large, and the amount of work to do to had them will dominate the overhead the collecting information in `changed_revs`. As this new code compute the changes on the fly, it unlock other interesting improvement to be done in later changeset.

phases: fast path public phase advance when everything is public Everything is already public, so we have nothing to do here.

phases: fast path retract of public phase There are no boundary to retract, so lets do nothing.

phases: keep internal state as rev-num instead of node-id Node-id are expensive to work with, dealing with revision is much simple and faster. The fact we still used node-id here shows how few effort have been put into making the phase logic fast. We tend to no longer use node-id internally for about ten years. This has a large impact of repository with many draft roots. For example this Mozilla-try copy have ½ Million draft roots and `perf::unbundle` see a significant improvement. ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.name = hg.perf.perf-unbundle # bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = no-rust # bin-env-vars.hg.py-re2-module = default # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.revs = last-1 before:: 1.746791 seconds after:: 1.278379 seconds (-26.82%) # benchmark.variants.revs = last-10 before:: 3.145774 seconds after:: 2.103735 seconds (-33.13%) # benchmark.variants.revs = last-100 before:: 3.487635 seconds after:: 2.446749 seconds (-29.85%) # benchmark.variants.revs = last-1000 before:: 5.007568 seconds after:: 3.989923 seconds (-20.32%)

phases: do filtering at read time This remove the need for the `filterunknown` method at all.

phases: always write with a repo In the future change that move the internal representation of phase-roots from node-id to rev-num, we will use a repository to translate revision numbers back to node at write time. Since that future change is quite complicated already, we do this small API change beforehand.