Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:40:32 +0100 setdiscovery: extract sample limitation in a `_limitsample` function stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:40:32 +0100] rev 23083
setdiscovery: extract sample limitation in a `_limitsample` function We need to reuse this logic for the initial query. We extract it in a function to unsure sample limiting is applied consistently in all cases.
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:24:46 -0500 exchange: don't report failure from identical bookmarks stable
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:24:46 -0500] rev 23082
exchange: don't report failure from identical bookmarks b901645a8784 regressed the behavior of pushing an unchanged bookmark to a remote. Before that commit, pushing a unchanged bookmark would result in "exporting bookmark @" being printed. After that commit, we now see an incorrect message "bookmark %s does not exist on the local or remote repository!" This patch fixes the regression introduced by b901645a8784 by having the bookmark error reporting code filter identical bookmarks and adds a test for the behavior.
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:40:37 -0700 bookmarks: explicitly track identical bookmarks stable
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:40:37 -0700] rev 23081
bookmarks: explicitly track identical bookmarks bookmarks.compare() previously lumped identical bookmarks in the "invalid" bucket. This patch adds a "same" bucket. An 8-tuple for holding this state is pretty gnarly. The return value should probably be converted into a class to increase readability. But that is beyond the scope of a patch intended to be a late arrival to stable.
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:52:20 -0500 context.status: remove incorrect swapping of added/removed in workingctx stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:52:20 -0500] rev 23080
context.status: remove incorrect swapping of added/removed in workingctx The comment in workingctx.status() says that "calling 'super' subtly reveresed the contexts", but that is simply not true, so we should not be swapping added and removed fields.
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:17:37 -0700 keyword: use parent of working copy as base for status stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:17:37 -0700] rev 23079
keyword: use parent of working copy as base for status Instead of calling repo[None].status(), use the more common form that uses the parent of the working copy as the base: repo['.'].status(). Note that the former defaults to comparing to revision '.', while the latter defaults to revision None, so the contexts being compared are the same. It might seem like this would result in a reverse diff, but it turns out that workingctx.status() incorrectly reverses the result. That bug will be fixed in a later commit.
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:53:37 +0900 revset: avoid O(n) lookup of invalid revision in rev() stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:53:37 +0900] rev 23078
revset: avoid O(n) lookup of invalid revision in rev() ba89f7b542c9 was not the final version of that patch. It was really slow because `l not in repo.changelog` iterates revisions up to `l`. Instead, rev() should utilize spanset.__contains__(). revset #0: rev(210000) 0) wall 0.000039 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 67978) 1) wall 0.002721 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 1055) 2) wall 0.000059 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 45599) (0: 3.2-rc, 1: ba89f7b542c9, 2: this patch) Note that the benchmark result described in ba89f7b542c9 is wrong because it is the one of the initial version.
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:44:34 -0500 run-tests: output diffs with only forward slashes stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:44:34 -0500] rev 23077
run-tests: output diffs with only forward slashes This removes some gratuitous variance when testing on Windows with test-run-tests.t.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip