Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:18:00 -0700] rev 32924
repair: move check for existing transaction earlier
Several benefits:
* Gets close the comment describing it
* Splits off unrelated comment about "backup" argument
* Error checking is customarily done early
* If we added an early return to the method, it would still
consistently fail if there was an existing transaction (so
we would find and fix that case quickly)
One test needs updating with for this change, because we no longer
create the backup bundle before we fail. I don't see much reason to
create that backup bundle. If some command was adding content and then
trying to strip it as well within the transaction, we would have a
backup for the user, but the risk of that not being discovered in
development seems very small.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:13:28 -0700] rev 32923
strip: remove unncessary "del" and inline variable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:24:21 -0700] rev 32922
repair: clarify in comment that caller must take lock, but not transaction
I have checked that all callers have already taken the lock (and if
they hadn't, we should have seen tests fail thanks to the 'transaction
requires locking' devel warning in localrepo.transaction()).
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:21:37 -0700] rev 32921
amend: use context manager for locking
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:20:29 -0700] rev 32920
strip: use context manager for locking and transaction in stripcmd()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:17:31 -0700] rev 32919
strip: use context manager for locking in strip()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:12 -0700] rev 32918
rebase: use context manager for locking in pullrebase()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:05 -0700] rev 32917
rebase: use context manager for locking in rebase()
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:53:54 -0400] rev 32916
test-http-proxy: redirect proxy stdout to /dev/null
This output hasn't been getting flushed, but would alter the log if it ever grew
large enough. See
23b07333a8b2.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:44:23 -0400] rev 32915
test-logtoprocess: don't run on Windows
Several bits of output were missing[1], unless the DETACHED_PROCESS flag is
_not_ passed to subprocess.Popen(). The problem with that is it briefly opens
and closes several cmd.exe windows on screen. Foozy also mentioned some other
issues in that thread.
With this, the last of the long standing Windows failures fixed, the test suite
now runs cleanly (536 ran, 67 skipped) on Windows 7 x64, with python 2.7.13. \o/
[1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-April/096987.html
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:06:22 +0900] rev 32914
revset: add support of keyword arguments to ancestors() and descendants()
Prepares for adding depth parameter.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 11:57:28 +0900] rev 32913
revsetlang: check arguments passed to ancestors() before optimizing to only()
Future patches will add depth parameter to ancestors(), which isn't compatible
with only().
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 11:39:03 +0900] rev 32912
revsetlang: factor out helper to match ancestors() in parsed tree
More checks will be added.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:34:18 +0900] rev 32911
templatekw: use common "rev:node" format as the default of predecessors
I'm not sure if this is better. If we're planning to add a template keyword
that returns obsoleted nodes unavailable in the repo (i.e. they have no valid
revision numbers), we might want to use the current "node"-only format
everywhere.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:23:55 +0900] rev 32910
templatekw: populate all keywords depending on predecessor in map operation
This is what showparents() does. repo[precnode] should never fail since its
validity is tested by closestpredecessors().