Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 30 Sep 2018 15:15:27 +0900] rev 39928
resolve: rename {status} to {mergestatus} to not shadow change status (BC)
This is a part of the name unification. I think it's somewhat useful to
provide a combined view of change/merge statuses.
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/GenericTemplatingPlan#Dictionary
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:06:01 -0400] rev 39927
py3: whitelist one additional test
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4817
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:11:07 +0100] rev 39926
logtoprocess: connect all fds to /dev/null to avoid bad interaction with pager
We detected that pager is waiting for log-to-process script to finish, which
is annoying when adding a script on commandfinish that does an HTTP push.
There seems to be no workaround on the script side and it will make the
behavior on Linux/MacOS closer to the Windows behavior.
The drawback is that it makes the related tests more flaky as log-to-process
outputs are now really asynchronous.
If it's considered a BC change, another option would be to add a config option
for this new behavior. I personally think that the different behavior between
Windows and Linux is confusing and that it's a bug I would be fine with a new
config option.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4816
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:35:36 +0100] rev 39925
logtoprocess: add a test to show pager and ltp bad interaction
The next changeset will fix the bad interaction between the pager and log-to-
process. Add a test first to make the next changeset easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4815
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:13:16 +0300] rev 39924
py3: add one more passing test to whitelist caught by buildbot
Thanks to Matt Harbison who fixed the remaining failures of this test.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4814
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:06:32 +0200] rev 39923
cleanupnodes: pass multiple predecessors to `createmarkers` directly
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Sat, 22 Sep 2018 14:40:33 +0200] rev 39922
obsolete: allow multiple predecessors in createmarkers
The logic for this change is similar to the change to `cleanupnodes` that we
did earlier. Now that the rebase code is trying to record a fold, we need to
actually record it in the markers. The first step is to have the markers
creation API able to receive such fold data.
To keep things sane, we restrict fold to on successors.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:03:09 +0200] rev 39921
obsolete: preindent code in createmarkers
This will help to make the next change clearer.