Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:47:53 -0500 addremove: automatically process a subrepository's subrepos
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:47:53 -0500] rev 23540
addremove: automatically process a subrepository's subrepos Since addremove on the top of a directory tree will recursively handle sub directories, it should be the same with deep subrepos, once the user has explicitly asked to process a subrepo. This really only has an effect when a path that is a subrepo (or is in a subrepo) is given, since -S causes all subrepos to be processed already. An addremove without a path that crosses into a subrepo, will still not enter any subrepos, per backward compatibility rules.
Sun, 09 Nov 2014 23:46:25 -0500 addremove: support addremove with explicit paths in subrepos
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Nov 2014 23:46:25 -0500] rev 23539
addremove: support addremove with explicit paths in subrepos Git and svn subrepos are currently not supported.
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:51:26 -0500 addremove: add support for the -S flag
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:51:26 -0500] rev 23538
addremove: add support for the -S flag Git and svn subrepos are currently not supported. It doesn't look like git or svn have these commands natively, so that's an area for a git or svn expert.
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:27:49 -0500 commit: propagate --addremove to subrepos if -S is specified (issue3759)
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:27:49 -0500] rev 23537
commit: propagate --addremove to subrepos if -S is specified (issue3759) The recursive addremove operation occurs completely before the first subrepo is committed. Only hg subrepos support the addremove operation at the moment- svn and git subrepos will warn and abort the commit.
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:13:38 -0500 subrepo: store the ui object in the base class
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:13:38 -0500] rev 23536
subrepo: store the ui object in the base class This will be used in the next patch to print a warning from the base class. It seems better than having to explicitly pass it to a new method, since a lot of existing methods also require it.
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:16:22 -0500 commit: abort if --addremove is specified, but fails
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:16:22 -0500] rev 23535
commit: abort if --addremove is specified, but fails This will be required when subrepo support is added, in order to ensure consistent commits when a subrepo flavor doesn't support addremove.
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:27:36 -0500 addremove: warn when addremove fails to operate on a named path
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:27:36 -0500] rev 23534
addremove: warn when addremove fails to operate on a named path It looks like a bad path is the only mode of failure for addremove. This warning is probably useful for the standalone command, but more important for 'commit -A'. That command doesn't currently abort if the addremove fails, but it will be made to do so prior to adding subrepo support, since not all subrepos will support addremove. We could just abort here, but it looks like addremove has always silently ignored bad paths, except for the exit code.
Sun, 09 Nov 2014 19:57:02 -0500 scmutil: pass a matcher to scmutil.addremove() instead of a list of patterns
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Nov 2014 19:57:02 -0500] rev 23533
scmutil: pass a matcher to scmutil.addremove() instead of a list of patterns This will make it easier to support subrepository operations.
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:46:47 -0500 tests: fix a typo in test-walkrepos.py
Enrique A. Tobis <enrique@tobis.com.ar> [Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:46:47 -0500] rev 23532
tests: fix a typo in test-walkrepos.py
Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:50:28 -0800 merge: extract _resolvetrivial() function
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:50:28 -0800] rev 23531
merge: extract _resolvetrivial() function We would eventually like to move the resolution of modify/delete and delete/modify conflicts to the resolve phase. However, we don't want to move the checks for identical content that were added in 902554884335 (merge: before cd/dc prompt, check that changed side really changed, 2014-12-01). Let's instead move these out to a new _resolvetrivial() function that processes the actions from manifestmerge() and replaces any false cd/dc conflicts. The function will also provide a natural place for us to later add code for resolving false 'm' conflicts.
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:10:51 -0800 largefiles: start by finding files of interest
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:10:51 -0800] rev 23530
largefiles: start by finding files of interest Instead of iterating over 'g' action, first find the set of all files that are largefiles in p1. Then iterate over these files. This prepares for considering actions other than 'g'.
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:03:53 -0800 largefiles: rewrite merge code using dictionary with entry per file
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:03:53 -0800] rev 23529
largefiles: rewrite merge code using dictionary with entry per file In overridecalculateupdates(), we currently only deal with conflicts that result in a 'g' action for either the largefile or a standin. We will soon want to deal cases with 'cd' and 'dc' actions here. It will be easier to reason about such cases if we rewrite it using a dict from filename to action. A side-effect of this change is that the output can only have one action per file (which should be a good change). Before this change, when one of the tests in test-issue3084 received this input (the 'a' in the input was a result of 'cd' conflict resolved in favor of the modified file): 'g': [('.hglf/f', ('',), 'remote created')], 'a': [('f', None, 'prompt keep')], and the user chose to keep the local largefile, it produced this output: 'g': [('.hglf/f', ('',), 'remote created')], 'r': [('f', None, 'replaced by standin')], 'a': [('f', None, 'prompt keep')], Although 'a' actions are processed after 'r' actions by recordupdates(), it still worked because 'a' actions have no effect on merges (only on updates). After this change, the output is: 'g': [('.hglf/f', ('',), 'remote created')], 'r': [('f', None, 'replaced by standin')], Similarly, there are several tests in test-largefiles-update that get inputs like: 'a': [('.hglf/large2', None, 'prompt keep')], 'g': [('large2', ('',), 'remote created')], and when the user chooses to keep the local largefile, they produce this output: 'a': [('.hglf/large2', None, 'prompt keep'), ('.hglf/large2', None, 'keep standin')], 'lfmr': [('large2', None, 'forget non-standin largefile')], In this case, it was not a merge but an update, so the 'a' action does have an effect. However, since dirstate.add() is idempotent, it still has no obserable effect. After this change, the output is: 'a': [('.hglf/large2', None, 'keep standin')], 'lfmr': [('large2', None, 'forget non-standin largefile')],
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:53:26 -0800 largefiles: put same 'action' object back in 'newglist'
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:53:26 -0800] rev 23528
largefiles: put same 'action' object back in 'newglist' The items we put in 'newglist' are always the same as what we found in actions['g'], so let's just put the same item into the list instead of creating a new one.
Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:20:42 -0800 largefiles: don't unnecessarily sort merge action lists
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:20:42 -0800] rev 23527
largefiles: don't unnecessarily sort merge action lists The action lists returned from calculateupdates() (in merge.py) are not required to be sorted. In fact, since they result from iteration over the unordered manifest, they are unlikely to be sorted. Moreover, some of the lists are appended to after they are returned from manifestmerge(). The lists are instead sorted in applyupdates(). Therefore, let's not sort the lists generated in largefiles' overridecalculateupdates().
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:49:55 -0800 merge: don't treat 'diverge' and 'renamedelete' like actions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:49:55 -0800] rev 23526
merge: don't treat 'diverge' and 'renamedelete' like actions See earlier patch for motivation.
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:18:31 -0800 merge: move dr/rd warning messages out of applyupdates()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:18:31 -0800] rev 23525
merge: move dr/rd warning messages out of applyupdates() As preparation for making 'dr' and 'rd' actions no longer actions, move the reporting from applyupdates() to its caller update(). This way we won't have to pass additonal arguments to applyupdates() when they are no longer actions. Also, the warnings are equally unrelated to applyupdates() as they are to recordupdates(), as they don't result in any changes to either the working copy or the dirstate. See earlier patch for additional motivation.
Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:13:26 -0800 merge: don't report progress for dr/rd actions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:13:26 -0800] rev 23524
merge: don't report progress for dr/rd actions It is easier to reason about certain algorithms in terms of a file->action mapping than the current action->list-of-files. Bid merge is already written this way (but with a list of actions per file), and largefiles' overridecalculateupdates() will also benefit. However, that requires us to have at most one action per file. That requirement is currently violated by 'dr' (divergent rename) and 'rd' (rename and delete) actions, which can exist for the same file as some other action. These actions are only used for displaying warnings to the user; they don't change anything in the working copy or the dirstate. In this way, they are similar to the 'k' (keep) action. However, they are even less action-like than 'k' is: 'k' at least describes what to do with the file ("do nothing"), while 'dr' and 'rd' or only annotations for files for which there may exist other, "real" actions. As a first step towards separating these acitons out, stop including them in the progress output, just like we already exclude the 'k' action.
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:32:51 +0100 subrepo: add partial diff support for git subrepos
Mathias De Maré <mathias.demare@gmail.com> [Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:32:51 +0100] rev 23523
subrepo: add partial diff support for git subrepos So far, git subrepositories were silently ignored for diffs. This patch adds support for git subrepositories, with the remark that --include and --exclude are not supported. If --include or --exclude are used, the subrepo is ignored.
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:41:21 +0100 subrepo: extend git version check to 3 digits
Mathias De Maré <mathias.demare@gmail.com> [Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:41:21 +0100] rev 23522
subrepo: extend git version check to 3 digits This allows more flexibility when a version check is required. Some git features are introduced in a version where only the 3rd digit changes.
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:33:03 +0100 subrepo: move git version check into a separate method
Mathias De Maré <mathias.demare@gmail.com> [Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:33:03 +0100] rev 23521
subrepo: move git version check into a separate method This allows checking the git version in other methods, instead of only being able to check if the version is ok or not.
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:22:02 +0200 rebase: show a note for updated mq patches
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:22:02 +0200] rev 23520
rebase: show a note for updated mq patches It deserves more than a debug message. Show a note like: updating mq patch p0.patch to 5:9ecc820b1737 The message could also refer to "qrefresh" instead. Same same.
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:20:35 +0100 rebase: improve debug messages while processing the list of rebases
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:20:35 +0100] rev 23519
rebase: improve debug messages while processing the list of rebases
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:20:35 +0100 rebase: show warning when rebase creates no changes to commit
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:20:35 +0100] rev 23518
rebase: show warning when rebase creates no changes to commit Similar to graft: note: rebase of 6:eea13746799a created no changes to commit
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 03:45:26 +0100 rebase: show more useful status information while rebasing
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 03:45:26 +0100] rev 23517
rebase: show more useful status information while rebasing Show status messages while rebasing, similar to what graft do: rebasing 12:2647734878ef "fork" (tip) This gives more context for the user when resolving conflicts.
Sun, 07 Dec 2014 20:04:45 +0100 tests: make 'saved backup' globbing less narrow in rebase tests
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Sun, 07 Dec 2014 20:04:45 +0100] rev 23516
tests: make 'saved backup' globbing less narrow in rebase tests Globbing the hash made it harder to maintain tests with run-tests -i when it was so far by the generated test output. The hashes are stable and we just need to add a (glob).
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 03:37:06 +0100 tests: stabilise mq rebase tests
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 03:37:06 +0100] rev 23515
tests: stabilise mq rebase tests Prepare for including hashes in output ... and less globbing make the tests easier to update.
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:45:12 -0500 test-graft: use strip extension instead of mq extension
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:45:12 -0500] rev 23514
test-graft: use strip extension instead of mq extension It only needs strip, no reason to load all of mq.
Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:52:46 -0800 transaction: remove the 'onabort' mechanism
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:52:46 -0800] rev 23513
transaction: remove the 'onabort' mechanism It has no known users. If someones needs similar functionality, a new 'addabort' method similar to 'addfinalize' should be added.
Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:51:41 -0800 transaction: remove the redundant 'onclose' mechanism
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:51:41 -0800] rev 23512
transaction: remove the redundant 'onclose' mechanism It is superseded by the 'addfinalize' function and all its user have been migrated.
Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:35:03 -0800 fncache: document the fact fncache is outdate at hook run time
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:35:03 -0800] rev 23511
fncache: document the fact fncache is outdate at hook run time Using 'addfinalize' to generate 'fncache' means that no pending version of the file will be generated for the hooks. We would have to use the 'addfilegenerator' method to get such result. However the 'fncachevfs' (who decide that a write is necessary) have no access to the transaction to register such file generation at add time. Having the transaction accessible to the 'vfs' is too much trouble for no benefit. This outdated 'fncache' file at hook time is not expected to be an issue. The previous move from 'onclose' to 'addfinalize' had no impact on this timing. I'm documenting it now because I looked at it.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip