Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Sep 2018 21:01:47 +0900] rev 39705
log: make changesetformatter pass in changectx to formatter
It wasn't necessary before, but user templates may have keywords that aren't
filled in by the changesetformatter.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Sep 2018 20:56:53 +0900] rev 39704
journal: use changesetformatter to properly nest list of commits in JSON
Before, two separate JSON documents were interleaved.
I chose the field name "changesets" over the option name "commits", since
each entry is called a "changeset" in log templates.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Sep 2018 07:53:50 +0900] rev 39703
journal: do not pass in repolookuperror string to template (BC)
This doesn't look like data, but a warning message.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Sep 2018 07:52:24 +0900] rev 39702
journal: inline formatted nodes and date into expression
The variable name "str" was misleading since these values aren't always
strings.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Sep 2018 07:48:43 +0900] rev 39701
journal: unify template name for "nodes" (BC)
This is a part of the name unification.
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/GenericTemplatingPlan#Dictionary
.. bc::
``{oldhashes}`` and ``{newhashes}`` in journal template are renamed to
``{oldnodes}`` and ``{newnodes}`` respectively.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:59:26 -0700] rev 39700
localrepo: extract resolving of opener options to standalone functions
Requirements and config options are converted into a dict which is
available to the store vfs to consult. This is how storage options
are communicated from the repo layer to the storage layer.
Currently, we do that option resolution in a private method on the
repo instance. And there is a single method doing that resolution.
Opener options are logically specific to the storage backend they
apply to. And, opener options may wish to influence how the repo
object/type is constructed. So it makes sense to have more granular
storage option resolution that occurs before the repo object is
instantiated.
This commit extracts the code for resolving opener options into new
module-level functions. These functions are run before the repo
instance is constructed.
As part of the code move, we split the option resolution into
generic and revlog-specific options. After this commit, we no longer
add revlog-specific options to repos that don't have a revlog
requirement.
Some of these opener options and associated config options might make
sense on alternate storage backends. We can always reuse config
options and opener option names for other backends. But we shouldn't
be passing opener options to storage backends that won't recognize
them. I haven't done it here, but after this commit it should be
possible for store backends to validate the set of opener options
it receives.
Because localrepository.openerreqs is no longer used after this commit,
it has been removed.
I'm not super thrilled about the code outside of localrepo that is
adding requirements and updating opener options. We'll probably want
to create a more formal API for that use case that constructs a new
repo instance and poisons the old repo object. But this was a
pre-existing issue and can be dealt with later. I have little doubt
it will cause me troubles as I continue to refactor how repository
objects are instantiated.
.. api::
``localrepository.openerreqs`` has been removed. Override
``localrepo.resolvestorevfsoptions()`` to add custom opener options.
.. api::
``localrepository._applyopenerreqs()`` has been removed. Use
``localrepo.resolvestorevfsoptions()`` to add custom opener options.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4576
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:17:47 -0700] rev 39699
localrepo: use boolean in opener options
Not sure why we're using an integer for a flag value here. I'm
pretty sure nothing relies on values being 1.
While we're here, convert to a dict comprehension.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4575
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:27 -0700] rev 39698
localrepo: move store() from store module
I want logic related to requirements handling to be in the localrepo
module so it is all in one place.
I would have loved to inline this logic. Unfortunately, statichttprepo
also calls it. I didn't want to inline it twice. We could potentially
refactor statichttppeer. But meh.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4574
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:05:51 -0700] rev 39697
localrepo: resolve store and cachevfs in makelocalrepository()
This is mostly a code move and refactor.
One change is that we now explicitly look for requirements indicating
a share is being used rather than blindly try to read from
.hg/sharedpath. Requirements *should* be all that is necessary to
dictate high-level behavior and I'm not sure why the previous code
was doing what it was.
The previous code has been in place since
87d1fd40f57e (authored in
2009). And the commit immediately after that (
971e38a9344b) introduced
``hg.share()`` and always wrote the ``shared`` requirement. And as far
as I can tell, every revision of ``hg.share()`` since has written
either the ``shared`` or ``relshared`` requirement. So I'm pretty
sure we don't need to maintain BC by always looking for and honoring
the ``.hg/sharedpath`` file even if a requirement isn't present.
.. bc::
A repository will no longer use shared storage if it has a
``.hg/sharedpath`` file but no entry in ``.hg/requires`` saying it
is shared.
This change should not have any end-user impact, as all shared
repos should have a ``.hg/requires`` file indicating this.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4573
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:10:45 -0700] rev 39696
localrepo: document and test bug around opening shared repos
As part of refactoring this code, I realized that we don't
validate the requirements of a shared repository. This commit
documents that next to the requirements validation code and adds a
test demonstrating the buggy behavior.
I'm not sure if I'll fix this. But it is definitely a bug that
users could encounter, as LFS, narrow, and potentially other
extensions dynamically add requirements on first use. One part
of this I'm not sure about is how to handle loading the .hg/hgrc
of the shared repo. We need to do that in order to load extensions.
But we don't want that repo's hgrc to overwrite the current repo's.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4572
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:03:17 -0700] rev 39695
localrepo: move requirements reasonability testing to own function
Just because we know how to handle each listed requirement doesn't
mean that set of requirements is reasonable.
This commit introduces an extension-wrappable function to validate
that a set of requirements makes sense.
We could combine this with ensurerequirementsrecognized(). But I think
having a line between basic membership testing and compatibility
checking is more powerful as it will help differentiate between
missing support and buggy behavior.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4571
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:47:24 -0700] rev 39694
statichttprepo: use new functions for requirements validation
The new code in localrepo for requirements gathering and validation
is more robust than scmutil.readrequires(). Let's port statichttprepo
to it.
Since scmutil.readrequires() is no longer used, it has been removed.
It is possible extensions were monkeypatching this to supplement the
set of supported requirements. But the proper way to do that is to
register a featuresetupfuncs. I'm comfortable forcing the API break
because featuresetupfuncs is more robust and has been supported for
a while.
.. api::
``scmutil.readrequires()`` has been removed.
Use ``localrepo.featuresetupfuncs`` to register new repository
requirements.
Use ``localrepo.ensurerequirementsrecognized()`` to validate them.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4570
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:54:17 -0700] rev 39693
localrepo: validate supported requirements in makelocalrepository()
This should be a glorified code move. I did take the opportunity to
refactor things. We now have a separate function for gathering
requirements and one for validating them.
I also mode cosmetic changes to the code, such as not using
abbreviations and using a set instead of list to model missing
requirements.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4569
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:45:52 -0700] rev 39692
localrepo: read requirements file in makelocalrepository()
Previously, scmutil.readrequires() loaded the requirements file
and validated its content against what was supported.
Requirements translate to repository features and are critical to
our plans to dynamically create local repository types. So, we must
load them in makelocalrepository() before a repository instance is
constructed.
This commit moves the reading of the .hg/requires file to
makelocalrepository(). Because scmutil.readrequires() was performing
I/O and validation, we inlined the validation into
localrepository.__init__ and removed scmutil.readrequires().
I plan to remove scmutil.readrequires() in a future commit (we can't
do it now because statichttprepo uses it).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4568
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:36:07 -0700] rev 39691
localrepo: check for .hg/ directory in makelocalrepository()
As part of this, we move the check to before .hg/hgrc is loaded,
as it makes sense to check for the directory before attempting to
open a file in it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4567