Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:39:58 +0200 filecache: refactor path join logic to a function stable
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:39:58 +0200] rev 16198
filecache: refactor path join logic to a function New users of filecache use different names for the function used to compute the runtime path of the cached file. Users should subclass filecache and provide their own version of this function to call the appropriate join function on 'obj' (an instance of the class that its member function was decorated).
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:24 -0600 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:24 -0600] rev 16197
merge with stable
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:24:57 +0100 subrepo: fix for merge inconsistencies stable
Friedrich Kastner-Masilko <kastner_masilko@at.festo.com> [Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:24:57 +0100] rev 16196
subrepo: fix for merge inconsistencies Merging ancestors with children is allowed if they are on different named branches. This did not work for subrepo merges before. To fix this inconsistency, the mergefunc() will now use the simple update path only if both versions are on the same named branch. If not, they get merged into a new changeset, just as if you did the merge from the subrepo's root directly.
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:41:11 +0100 bundlerepo: bundle repos should be non-publishing (issue3266) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:41:11 +0100] rev 16195
bundlerepo: bundle repos should be non-publishing (issue3266) Bundle repo contains both the bundle content and the content of the repository used as a base. This create bugs with phases exchange because the "remote" repository claim to contains changeset it does not. The easiest way to fix this bug is to ensure a bundle repo as non publishing. This way changeset will be seen in the same phase than locally. This patch does not alter in which phase bundle revision are seen. For now they are seen as if an old client had add them on the remote: They inherit their phase from parent whatever the parent is. This is to be fixed in a later patch
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:34:19 +0100 bookmarks: restore python 2.4 compatibility stable
Gilles Moris <gilles.moris@free.fr> [Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:34:19 +0100] rev 16194
bookmarks: restore python 2.4 compatibility Remove py25 'try except finally' clause.
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:43:03 +0000 bugzilla: stop XMLRPC requests from requesting gzipped responses stable
Jim Hague <jim.hague@acm.org> [Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:43:03 +0000] rev 16193
bugzilla: stop XMLRPC requests from requesting gzipped responses Python 2.7 introduced support for gzip encoding in xmlrpclib.Transport. We do our own handling of responses, and don't currently support gzip encoding. So to run successfully under Python 2.7 with a web server configured to gzip encode, stop XMLRPC requests from announcing gzip encoding support.
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:17:53 -0600 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:17:53 -0600] rev 16192
merge with stable
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:47:46 +0200 update: delete bookmarks.current when explicitly updating to a rev (issue3276) stable
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:47:46 +0200] rev 16191
update: delete bookmarks.current when explicitly updating to a rev (issue3276)
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:06:35 +0100 convert: ignore blank lines in mapfiles (issue3286) stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:06:35 +0100] rev 16190
convert: ignore blank lines in mapfiles (issue3286)
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:07:55 +0200 update: don't move the active bookmark if a rev is specified with -r stable
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:07:55 +0200] rev 16189
update: don't move the active bookmark if a rev is specified with -r
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip