Sat, 13 Dec 2014 22:44:22 -0500 subrepo: use 'self.ui' instead of 'self._repo.ui'
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 22:44:22 -0500] rev 23574
subrepo: use 'self.ui' instead of 'self._repo.ui' They are now equivalent, but the former is slightly more readable.
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:43:01 -0500 subrepo: reset 'self.ui' to the subrepo copy of 'ui' in the hgsubrepo class
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:43:01 -0500] rev 23573
subrepo: reset 'self.ui' to the subrepo copy of 'ui' in the hgsubrepo class Creation of the subrepo's '_repo' object creates a new 'ui' by combining the parent repo's 'baseui' and reading in the subrepo's hgrc file. This simply avoids 'self.ui' and 'self._repo.ui' pointing to different objects, which seems like a potential source of bugs. Git and Svn subrepos are unchanged, because they don't have their own ui, and have always used their parent's for their configuration.
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:19:38 -0500 subrepo: rename the '_ui' member to 'ui'
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:19:38 -0500] rev 23572
subrepo: rename the '_ui' member to 'ui' The localrepository class has a 'ui' member, so keeping the names the same will allow for duck typing with subrepo instances when accessing 'ui'. Changing this is easier than finding all of the localrepository instance uses and renaming that to '_ui'.
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:13:07 -0500 subrepo: drop the '_ui' member in the subrepo subclasses
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:13:07 -0500] rev 23571
subrepo: drop the '_ui' member in the subrepo subclasses This member has existed in the base class since fcbc66b5da6a.
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:35:04 -0500 graphmod: attempt to clarify documentation of groupbranchiter()
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:35:04 -0500] rev 23570
graphmod: attempt to clarify documentation of groupbranchiter() Thanks to Pierre-Yves for checking my cleanups here and helping me understand the algorithm well enough to help document it.
Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:20:28 -0500 graphmod: rename graph-topological config to graph-group-branches
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:20:28 -0500] rev 23569
graphmod: rename graph-topological config to graph-group-branches The latter suggests what the change is slightly better.
Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:28:17 +0200 groupbranchiter: allow callers to select the first branch
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:28:17 +0200] rev 23568
groupbranchiter: allow callers to select the first branch Instead of just bootstrapping the algorithm with the first revision we see, allow callers to pass revs that should be displayed first. All branches are retained until we can display such revision. Expected usage is to display the current working copy parent first.
Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:05:36 +0200 groupbranchiter: support for non-contiguous revsets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:05:36 +0200] rev 23567
groupbranchiter: support for non-contiguous revsets The algorithm now works when some revisions are skipped. We now use "first included ancestors" instead of just "parent" to link changesets with each other.
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:08:59 +0000 groubranchhiter: indent most of the inner code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:08:59 +0000] rev 23566
groubranchhiter: indent most of the inner code We are going to add an additional layer of indentation to support non-contiguous revset. We do it in a pure code movement changeset to help the readability of the next changeset.
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:37:59 +0000 graphlog: add a way to test the 'groupbranchiter' function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:37:59 +0000] rev 23565
graphlog: add a way to test the 'groupbranchiter' function We add an experimental config option to use the topological sorting. I first tried to hook the 'groupbranchiter' function in the 'sort' revset but this was useless because graphlog enforces revision number sorting :( As the goal is to advance on the topological iteration logic, I see this experimental option as a good way to move forward. We have to use turn the iterator into a list because the graphlog is apparently not ready for pure iterator input yet.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip