FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23189
largefiles: get function to write status messages via "getstatuswriter()"
This patch makes "updatelfiles()" get appropriate function to write
largefiles specific status messages via "getstatuswriter()".
This patch introduces None as "print messages if needed", because True
(forcibly writing) and False (forcibly ignoring) are already used for
"printmessage" of "updatelfiles".
Subsequent patch will move "avoid printing messages only while
automated committing" decision from caller of "updatelfiles()" into
"getstatuswriter()".
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23188
largefiles: introduce "_lfstatuswriters" to customize status reporting
"lfutil.getstatuswriter" is the utility to get appropriate function to
write largefiles specific status out from "repo._lfstatuswriters".
This patch uses "stack" with an element instead of flag like
"_isXXXXing" or so, because:
- the former works correctly even when customizations are nested, and
- ensuring at least one element can ignore empty check
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23187
largefiles: update standins only at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue"
Before this patch, "hg rebase --continue" may record incorrect
standins, because largefiles extension always avoid updating standins
while rebasing, even though largefiles in the working directory may be
modified manually at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue".
But, on the other hand, updating standins should be avoided at
subsequent commits for efficiency reason.
To update standins only at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue",
this patch introduces state-full callable object
"automatedcommithook", which updates standins by
"lfutil.updatestandinsbymatch()" only at the 1st commit of resuming.
Even after this patch, "repo._isrebasing = True" is still needed to
avoid some status report while updating largefiles in
"lfcommands.updatelfiles()".
This is reason why this patch omits not "repo._isrebasing = True" in
"overriderebase" but examination of "getattr(repo, "_isrebasing",
False)" in "updatestandinsbymatch".
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23186
largefiles: introduce "_lfcommithooks" to abstract pre-committing procedures
This changes allows to customize pre-committing procedures according
to conditions.
This patch uses "stack" with an element instead of flag like
"_isXXXXing" or so, because:
- the former works correctly even when customizations are nested, and
- ensuring at least one element can ignore empty check
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23185
largefiles: factor out procedures to update standins for pre-committing
This patch factors out procedures to update standins for
pre-committing. This is one of preparations to avoid execution of such
procedures according to invocation context.
For example, resuming automated committing (e.g. "hg rebase
--continue") should update standins at the 1st commit, because
largefiles in the working directory may be modified manually. But on
the other hand, it should avoid updating standins at subsequent
committings for efficiency reason.
For simplicity, this patch just moves procedures mechanically only
with replacing below.
- "self" => "repo"
- "lfutil." => (none)
- "orig" invocation => returning "match"
Using "fstandin" instead "standin" as the name of local variable for
the loop below is the only special care, because the latter shadows
the same name function in "lfutil.py".
[before]
for standin in standins:
lfile = lfutil.splitstandin(standin)
if lfdirstate[lfile] != 'r':
lfutil.updatestandin(self, standin)
[after]
for fstandin in standins:
lfile = splitstandin(fstandin)
if lfdirstate[lfile] != 'r':
updatestandin(repo, fstandin)
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23184
largefiles: factor out procedures to update lfdirstate for post-committing
Before this patch, procedures to update lfdirstate for post-committing
are scattered in "lfilesrepo.commit". In the case of "hg commit" with
patterns for target files ("Case 2"), lfdirstate is updated BEFORE
real committing.
This patch factors out procedures to update lfdirstate for
post-committing into "lfutil.markcommitted", and makes it callable via
"markcommitted" of the context passed to "lfilesrepo.commitctx".
"markcommitted" of the context is called, only when it is committed
successfully.
Passing original "markcommitted" of the context is meaningless in this
patch, but required in subsequent one to prepare something before
invocation of it.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23183
largefiles: remove meaningless code path for "hg pull --rebase"
This patch removes "--rebase" specific code path for "hg pull" in
"overridepull", because previous patch makes it meaningless: now,
"rebase.rebase" ("orig" invocation in this patch) can
update/commit largefiles safely without "repo._isrebasing = True".
As a side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation in
"overridepull", this patch removes "nothing to rebase ..." message in
"test-largefiles.t", which is shown only when rebase extension is
enabled AFTER largefiles:
before this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull" at
first, because rebase wraps "hg pull" later
2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig",
even though rebase assumes that "orig" is "pull" of commands
3. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" directly
3.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X"
3.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent "Y" on "X"
4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase"
5. "pullrebase" tries to rebase, but there is nothing to be done,
because "Y" is already rebased on "X". then, it shows "nothing
to rebase ..."
after this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull"
2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig"
3. "overridepull" executes "pull" as "orig"
4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase"
5. revision "Y" is not yet rebased, so "pullrebase" doesn't shows
"nothing to rebase ..."
As another side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation, this
patch fixes
issue3861, which occurs only when rebase extension is
enabled BEFORE largefiles:
before this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first,
because largefiles wrap "hg pull" later
2. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" explicitly
2.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X"
2.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent, but fails because
no revision is checked out in
issue3861 case
3. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 1 returned
from "rebase" at (2.2)
4. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 1 unexpectedly
after this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first
2. "overridepull" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "orig"
3. "pullrebase" invokes "pull" as "orig"
4. "pullrebase" invokes "rebase", and it fails
5. "pullrebase" returns to "overridepull" with exit code 0
(because "pullrebase" ignores result of "pull" and "rebase")
6. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 0 returned
from "rebase" at (5)
7. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 0
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23182
largefiles: wrap "rebase.rebase" for functions using it directly
Before this patch, largefiles extension wraps only "rebase" in the
command table by "extensions.wrapcommand". But there are some
functions using "rebase.rebase" directly.
Without special care for them, largefiles extension can't work
correctly with such functions. In addition to it, "special care" often
becomes complicated and awkward. For example:
- "unshelve" can't get correct result of "rebase.rebase", because of
lack of special care
- special care for "hg pull --rebase" causes
issue3861
This patch wraps "rebase.rebase" for functions using it directly.
For simplicity, this patch keeps 'special care for "hg pull --rebase"'.
It is removed in the subsequent patch.
Sune Foldager <cryo@cyanite.org> [Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:41:11 +0200] rev 23181
changegroup: introduce cg2packer/unpacker
cg2 supports generaldelta in changegroups, to be used in bundle2.
Since generaldelta is handled directly in cg2, reordering is switched
off by default.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:19:24 -0700] rev 23180
push: send highest changegroup format supported by both side
When using bundle2, we find the common subset of supported changegroup-packers
and we pick the max of them. This allow to use generaldelta aware changegroups through
bundle2.