Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:03:30 +0900 cmdserver: write early exception to 'e' channel in 'unix' mode
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:03:30 +0900] rev 28511
cmdserver: write early exception to 'e' channel in 'unix' mode In 'unix' mode, the server is typically detached from the console. Therefore a client couldn't see the exception that occurred while instantiating the server object. This patch tries to catch the early error and send it to 'e' channel even if the server isn't instantiated yet. This means the error may be sent before the initial hello message. So it's up to the client implementation whether to handle the early error message or error out as protocol violation. The error handling code is also copied to chgserver.py. I'll factor out them later if we manage to get chg passes the test suite.
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:32:42 +0530 contrib: make memory.py use absolute_import
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:32:42 +0530] rev 28510
contrib: make memory.py use absolute_import
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:08:39 +0530 check-code: use absolute_import and print_function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:08:39 +0530] rev 28509
check-code: use absolute_import and print_function
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:27:26 -0800 encoding: use range() instead of xrange()
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:27:26 -0800] rev 28508
encoding: use range() instead of xrange() Python 3 doesn't have xrange(). Instead, range() on Python 3 is a generator, like xrange() is on Python 2. The benefits of xrange() over range() are when there are very large ranges that are too expensive to pre-allocate. The code here is only creating <128 values, so the benefits of xrange() should be negligible. With this patch, encoding.py imports safely on Python 3.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:23:34 -0800 encoding: make HFS+ ignore code Python 3 compatible
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:23:34 -0800] rev 28507
encoding: make HFS+ ignore code Python 3 compatible unichr() doesn't exist in Python 3. chr() is the equivalent there. Unfortunately, we can't use chr() outright because Python 2 only accepts values smaller than 256. Also, Python 3 returns an int when accessing a character of a bytes type (s[x]). So, we have to ord() the values in the assert statement.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:28:58 +0000 extensions: factor import error reporting out
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:28:58 +0000] rev 28506
extensions: factor import error reporting out To clarify third party extensions lookup, we are about to add a third place where extensions are searched for. So we factor the error reporting logic out to be able to easily reuse it in the next patch.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:24:54 +0000 extensions: extract the 'importh' closure as normal function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:24:54 +0000] rev 28505
extensions: extract the 'importh' closure as normal function There is no reason for this to be a closure so we extract it for clarity.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:40:58 -0800 zeroconf: remove leftover camelcase identifier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:40:58 -0800] rev 28504
zeroconf: remove leftover camelcase identifier eb9d0e828c30 (zeroconf: remove camelcase in identifiers, 2016-03-01) forgot one occurrence of "numAuthorities", which makes test-paths.t fail for me. I don't even know what zeroconf is, but this patch seems obviously correct and it fixes the failing test case.
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900 hg: acquire wlock while updating the working directory via updatetotally
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900] rev 28503
hg: acquire wlock while updating the working directory via updatetotally updatetotally() might be invoked outside wlock scope (e.g. invocation via postincoming() at "hg unbundle" or "hg pull"). In such case, acquisition of wlock is needed for consistent view, because parallel "hg update" and/or "hg bookmarks" might change working directory status while executing updatetotally(). Strictly speaking, truly consistent updating should acquire also store lock, because active bookmark might be moved to another one outside wlock scope (e.g. pulling from other repository causes updating current active one). Acquisition of wlock in this patch ensures consistency in as same level as past "hg update".
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900 commands: add postincoming docstring for explanation of arguments
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900] rev 28502
commands: add postincoming docstring for explanation of arguments
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900 commands: centralize code to update with extra care for non-file components
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900] rev 28501
commands: centralize code to update with extra care for non-file components This patch centralizes similar code paths to update the working directory with extra care for non-file components (e.g. bookmark) into newly added function updatetotally(). 'if True' at the beginning of updatetotally() is redundant at this patch, but useful to reduce amount of changes in subsequent patch.
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900 update: omit redundant activating message for already active bookmark
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:35:42 +0900] rev 28500
update: omit redundant activating message for already active bookmark This patch also adds "hg bookmarks" invocation into tests, where redundant message is omitted but bookmark activity isn't clear from context.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:44:03 -0800 tests: make test-verify-repo-operations.py not run by default
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:44:03 -0800] rev 28499
tests: make test-verify-repo-operations.py not run by default test-verify-repo-operations.py currently starts way too late and extends the running time with -j50 on my machine from around 3:48 min to 6:30 min. We could of course make it run earlier, but the test case seems unlikely to find bugs not covered by other tests, so let's mark it "slow" instead. I think this type of test is better suited to running separately in a long-running job.
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:37:16 +0000 ui: log devel warnings
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:37:16 +0000] rev 28498
ui: log devel warnings
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:22:04 +0000 util: refactor getstackframes
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:22:04 +0000] rev 28497
util: refactor getstackframes
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:50:14 +0000 util: reword debugstacktrace comment
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:50:14 +0000] rev 28496
util: reword debugstacktrace comment
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:40:20 -0800 changelog: avoid slicing raw data until needed
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:40:20 -0800] rev 28495
changelog: avoid slicing raw data until needed Before, we were slicing the original raw text and storing individual variables with values corresponding to each field. This is avoidable overhead. With this patch, we store the offsets of the fields at construction time and perform the slice when a property is accessed. This appears to show a very marginal performance win on its own and the gains are so small as to not be worth reporting. However, this patch marks the end of our parsing refactor, so it is worth reporting the gains from the entire series: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.795987 89% desc(bug) 0.887169 0.803438 90% date(2015) 0.878797 0.773961 88% extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.761603 88% author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.576025 87% author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.593335 88% date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 0.875270 90% author(mpm) or desc(bug) or date(2015) or extra(rebase_source) 3.656193 3.183104 87% Pretty consistent speed-up across the board for any revset accessing changelog revision data. Not bad! It's also worth noting that PyPy appears to experience a similar to marginally greater speed-up as well! According to statprof, revsets accessing changelog revision data are now clearly dominated by zlib decompression (16-17% of execution time). Surprisingly, it appears the most expensive part of revision parsing are the various text.index() calls to search for newlines! These appear to cumulatively add up to 5+% of execution time. I reckon implementing the parsing in C would make things marginally faster. If accessing larger strings (such as the commit message), encoding.tolocal() is the most expensive procedure outside of decompression.
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:13:54 -0800 changelog: parse description last
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:13:54 -0800] rev 28494
changelog: parse description last Before, we first searched for the double newline as the first step in the parse then moved to the front of the string and worked our way to the back again. This made sense when we were splitting the raw text on the double newline. But in our new newline scanning based approach, this feels awkward. This patch updates the parsing logic to parse the text linearly and deal with the description field last. Because we're avoiding an extra string scan, revsets appear to demonstrate a very slight performance win. But the percentage change is marginal, so the numbers aren't worth reporting.
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:31:06 -0800 changelog: lazily parse files
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:31:06 -0800] rev 28493
changelog: lazily parse files More of the same. Again, modest revset performance wins: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.822961 0.805156 desc(bug) 0.887169 0.847054 0.798101 date(2015) 0.878797 0.811613 0.786689 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.797756 0.777408 author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.668172 1.626547 author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.677608 1.613941 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 0.896032 0.869017
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0800 changelog: lazily parse date/extra field
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0800] rev 28492
changelog: lazily parse date/extra field This is probably the most complicated patch in the parsing refactor. Because the date and extras are encoded in the same field, we stuff the entire field into a dedicated variable and add a property for accessing the sub-components of each. There is some duplicated code here. But the code is relatively simple, so it shouldn't be a big deal. We see revset performance wins across the board: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.876713 0.822961 desc(bug) 0.887169 0.895514 0.847054 date(2015) 0.878797 0.820987 0.811613 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.823811 0.797756 author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.784160 1.668172 author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.822756 1.677608 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 0.910981 0.896032 author(mpm) or desc(bug) or date(2015) or extra(rebase_source) 3.656193 3.516788 3.265024 We see a speed-up on revsets accessing date and extras because the new parsing code only parses what you access. Even though they are stored the same text field, we avoid parsing dates when accessing extras and vice-versa. But strangely revsets accessing both date and extras appeared to speed up as well! I'm not sure if this is due to refactoring the parsing code or due to an optimization in revsets. You can't argue with the results!
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:29:46 -0800 changelog: lazily parse user
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:29:46 -0800] rev 28491
changelog: lazily parse user Same strategy as before. Revsets not accessing the user demonstrate a slight performance win: desc(bug) 0.887169 0.910400 0.895514 date(2015) 0.878797 0.870697 0.820987 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.841644 0.823811 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 0.945792 0.910981
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:29:13 -0800 changelog: lazily parse manifest node
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:29:13 -0800] rev 28490
changelog: lazily parse manifest node Like the description, we store the raw bytes and convert from hex on access. This patch also marks the beginning of our new parsing method, which is based on newline offsets and doesn't rely on str.split(). Many revsets showed a performance improvement: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.869085 0.868598 desc(bug) 0.887169 0.928164 0.910400 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.871500 0.841644 author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.791589 1.731503 author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.851003 1.798764 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 0.974027 0.945792
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:28:46 -0800 changelog: lazily parse description
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:28:46 -0800] rev 28489
changelog: lazily parse description Before, the description field was converted to a localstr at parse time. With this patch, we store the raw description and convert to a localstr when it is first accessed. We see a revset speedup for revsets that don't access the description: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.914234 0.869085 date(2015) 0.878797 0.891980 0.862525 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.912514 0.871500 author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.860402 1.791589 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 0.994673 0.974027 author(mpm) or desc(bug) or date(2015) or extra(rebase_source) 3.656193 3.721032 3.643593 As you can see, most of these revsets are already faster than from before this refactoring: we have already offset the performance loss from the introduction of the new class representing parsed changelog entries!
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:26:37 -0800 context: use changelogrevision
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:26:37 -0800] rev 28488
context: use changelogrevision Upcoming patches will make the changelogrevision object perform lazy parsing. Let's switch to it. Because we're switching from a tuple to an object, everthing that accesses the internal cached attribute needs to be updated to access via attributes. A nice side-effect is this makes the code easier to read! Surprisingly, this appears to make revsets accessing this data slightly faster (values are before series, p1, this patch): author(mpm) 0.896565 0.929984 0.914234 desc(bug) 0.887169 0.935642 0.921073 date(2015) 0.878797 0.908094 0.891980 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.922624 0.912514 author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.902112 1.860402 author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.860977 1.844850 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 1.005824 0.994673 author(mpm) or desc(bug) or date(2015) or extra(rebase_source) 3.656193 3.743381 3.721032
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:28:02 -0800 changelog: add class to represent parsed changelog revisions
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:28:02 -0800] rev 28487
changelog: add class to represent parsed changelog revisions Currently, changelog entries are parsed into their respective components at read time. Many operations are only interested in a subset of fields of a changelog entry. The parsing and storing of all the fields adds avoidable overhead. This patch introduces the "changelogrevision" class. It takes changelog raw text and exposes the parsed results as attributes. The code for parsing changelog entries has been moved into its construction function. changelog.read() has been modified to use the new class internally while maintaining its existing API. Future patches will make revision parsing lazy. We implement the construction function of the new class with __new__ instead of __init__ so we can use a named tuple to represent the empty revision. This saves overhead and complexity of coercing later versions of this class to represent an empty instance. While we are here, we add a method on changelog to obtain an instance of the new type. The overhead of constructing the new class regresses performance of revsets accessing this data: author(mpm) 0.896565 0.929984 desc(bug) 0.887169 0.935642 105% date(2015) 0.878797 0.908094 extra(rebase_source) 0.865446 0.922624 106% author(mpm) or author(greg) 1.801832 1.902112 105% author(mpm) or desc(bug) 1.812438 1.860977 date(2015) or branch(default) 0.968276 1.005824 author(mpm) or desc(bug) or date(2015) or extra(rebase_source) 3.656193 3.743381 Once lazy parsing is implemented, these revsets will all be faster than before. There is no performance change on revsets that do not access this data. There /could/ be a performance regression on operations that perform several changelog reads. However, I can't think of anything outside of revsets and `hg log` (basically the same as a revset) that would be impacted.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:51:22 -0500 httppeer: compute header names only once
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:51:22 -0500] rev 28486
httppeer: compute header names only once This also helps make the code a little more readable.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:33:43 -0500 httppeer: indent existing argument handling with if True
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:33:43 -0500] rev 28485
httppeer: indent existing argument handling with if True I'm about to add another case, so it makes sense to split this out to make the semantic changes in the next change more obvious.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:26:12 -0500 httppeer: move size computation later in _callstream
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:26:12 -0500] rev 28484
httppeer: move size computation later in _callstream A future change will alter some of the arg-sending logic in a way that matters for request body size. Centralizing the logic now will make later patches easier to review.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:24:50 -0500 httppeer: do less splitting on httpheader value
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:24:50 -0500] rev 28483
httppeer: do less splitting on httpheader value We only care about the first value split off, so only split off the first value.
Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:17:37 +0900 chgserver: remove outdated comment about setvbuf()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:17:37 +0900] rev 28482
chgserver: remove outdated comment about setvbuf() I've replaced setvbuf() by fdopen() before merging chg into the core, so this comment is wrong. https://bitbucket.org/yuja/chg/commits/5c24e72bc447
Tue, 01 Mar 2016 04:53:43 +0000 transplant: use absolute_import
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Tue, 01 Mar 2016 04:53:43 +0000] rev 28481
transplant: use absolute_import
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:07:22 +0000 transplant: switch to using nodemod for hex+short
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:07:22 +0000] rev 28480
transplant: switch to using nodemod for hex+short
Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:32:52 +0000 convert: bzr use absolute_import
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:32:52 +0000] rev 28479
convert: bzr use absolute_import
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:00:20 +0000 chgserver: include [extdiff] in confighash
Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:00:20 +0000] rev 28478
chgserver: include [extdiff] in confighash extdiff's uisetup will register new commands. If we do not include it in confighash, changes to [extdiff] will not get new commands registered. This patch adds extdiff to confighash and makes it possible for chg to pass test-extdiff.t.
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:52:06 +0000 chg: silently inherit server exit code
Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:52:06 +0000] rev 28477
chg: silently inherit server exit code If chgserver aborts during startup, for example, error.ParseError when parsing a config file, chg client probably just wants to exit with a same exit code without printing other unrelated text. This patch changes the text "cmdserver exited with status" from abortmsg to debugmsg and exits with a same exit code.
Sun, 06 Mar 2016 03:19:08 +0530 debugshell: use absolute_import
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Mar 2016 03:19:08 +0530] rev 28476
debugshell: use absolute_import
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:26:58 +0900 test: make check-py3-compat.py ignore empty code more reliably
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:26:58 +0900] rev 28475
test: make check-py3-compat.py ignore empty code more reliably It couldn't exclude an empty file containing comments. That's why hgext/__init__.py had been listed in test-check-py3-compat.t before "hgext: officially turn 'hgext' into a namespace package".
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:30:43 +0800 patchbomb: specify unit for ui.progress when sending emails
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:30:43 +0800] rev 28474
patchbomb: specify unit for ui.progress when sending emails
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:28:27 +0800 streamclone: specify unit for ui.progress when handling data
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:28:27 +0800] rev 28473
streamclone: specify unit for ui.progress when handling data
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:30:29 +0800 churn: specify unit for ui.progress when analyzing revisions
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:30:29 +0800] rev 28472
churn: specify unit for ui.progress when analyzing revisions
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:30:04 +0800 convert: specify unit for ui.progress when scanning paths
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:30:04 +0800] rev 28471
convert: specify unit for ui.progress when scanning paths
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:29:51 +0800 convert: specify unit for ui.progress when operating on files
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:29:51 +0800] rev 28470
convert: specify unit for ui.progress when operating on files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:47:39 +0000 tests: stabilize svn output
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:47:39 +0000] rev 28469
tests: stabilize svn output With 1.9.3 extra bits were appearing...
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:29:20 +0800 similar: specify unit for ui.progress when operating on files
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:29:20 +0800] rev 28468
similar: specify unit for ui.progress when operating on files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:18:41 +0800 verify: specify unit for ui.progress when checking files
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:18:41 +0800] rev 28467
verify: specify unit for ui.progress when checking files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:44:40 +0800 repair: specify unit for ui.progress in rebuildfncache()
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:44:40 +0800] rev 28466
repair: specify unit for ui.progress in rebuildfncache()
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:39:29 +0800 repair: use 'rebuilding' progress topic in rebuildfncache()
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:39:29 +0800] rev 28465
repair: use 'rebuilding' progress topic in rebuildfncache()
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:26:06 +0800 largefiles: use revisions as a ui.progress unit
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:26:06 +0800] rev 28464
largefiles: use revisions as a ui.progress unit Using plural form is consistent with other progress units, and "1 out of 5 revisions" sounds more correct. Also, tests don't show this, but if you have 'speed' item in progress.format config, it shows e.g. '100 revisions/sec', which also seems better.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -48 +48 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip