# HG changeset patch # User Pierre-Yves David # Date 1583427305 -3600 # Node ID 45f3f35cefe7d67b63ba55de2bf688d54f33bcac # Parent f365dfede78f2c0e9133d1cd7402f1898685c7d9 copies: fix the changeset based algorithm regarding merge In 99ebde4fec99, we changed the list of files stored into the `files` field. This lead to the changeset centric copy algorithm to break in various merge situation involving merge. Older information could reach the merge through `p1`, and while information from `p2` was strictly fresher, it would get overwritten anyway. We update the situation with more details about which revision introduces rename information. This help use making the right decision in case of merge. We are now running a more comprehensive suite of test with include this kind of situation. The behavior differ slightly from the filelog based in a couple of instance. There is mostly two distinct cases: 1) there are conflicting rename information in a merge (different rename history on each side). In this case the filelog based implementation arbitrarily pick a side based on the file-revision-number. So it depends on a local factor. The changeset centric algorithm will use a deterministic approach, by picking the information coming from the first parent of the merge. This is stable across different clone. 2) rename information related to file that exist in both source and destination. The filelog based implementation do not even try to detect these, however the changeset centric one get them for "free" (it is simpler to detect them than not). The new implementation focus on correctness. Performance improvement will come later. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8244 diff -r f365dfede78f -r 45f3f35cefe7 mercurial/copies.py --- a/mercurial/copies.py Fri Apr 24 15:06:42 2020 -0400 +++ b/mercurial/copies.py Thu Mar 05 17:55:05 2020 +0100 @@ -183,10 +183,27 @@ * p1copies: mapping of copies from p1 * p2copies: mapping of copies from p2 * removed: a list of removed files + * ismerged: a callback to know if file was merged in that revision """ cl = repo.changelog parents = cl.parentrevs + def get_ismerged(rev): + ctx = repo[rev] + + def ismerged(path): + if path not in ctx.files(): + return False + fctx = ctx[path] + parents = fctx._filelog.parents(fctx._filenode) + nb_parents = 0 + for n in parents: + if n != node.nullid: + nb_parents += 1 + return nb_parents >= 2 + + return ismerged + if repo.filecopiesmode == b'changeset-sidedata': changelogrevision = cl.changelogrevision flags = cl.flags @@ -218,6 +235,7 @@ def revinfo(rev): p1, p2 = parents(rev) + value = None if flags(rev) & REVIDX_SIDEDATA: e = merge_caches.pop(rev, None) if e is not None: @@ -228,12 +246,22 @@ removed = c.filesremoved if p1 != node.nullrev and p2 != node.nullrev: # XXX some case we over cache, IGNORE - merge_caches[rev] = (p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed) + value = merge_caches[rev] = ( + p1, + p2, + p1copies, + p2copies, + removed, + get_ismerged(rev), + ) else: p1copies = {} p2copies = {} removed = [] - return p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed + + if value is None: + value = (p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed, get_ismerged(rev)) + return value else: @@ -242,7 +270,7 @@ ctx = repo[rev] p1copies, p2copies = ctx._copies removed = ctx.filesremoved() - return p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed + return p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed, get_ismerged(rev) return revinfo @@ -256,6 +284,7 @@ revinfo = _revinfogetter(repo) cl = repo.changelog + isancestor = cl.isancestorrev # XXX we should had chaching to this. missingrevs = cl.findmissingrevs(common=[a.rev()], heads=[b.rev()]) mrset = set(missingrevs) roots = set() @@ -283,10 +312,14 @@ iterrevs.update(roots) iterrevs.remove(b.rev()) revs = sorted(iterrevs) - return _combinechangesetcopies(revs, children, b.rev(), revinfo, match) + return _combinechangesetcopies( + revs, children, b.rev(), revinfo, match, isancestor + ) -def _combinechangesetcopies(revs, children, targetrev, revinfo, match): +def _combinechangesetcopies( + revs, children, targetrev, revinfo, match, isancestor +): """combine the copies information for each item of iterrevs revs: sorted iterable of revision to visit @@ -305,7 +338,7 @@ # this is a root copies = {} for i, c in enumerate(children[r]): - p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed = revinfo(c) + p1, p2, p1copies, p2copies, removed, ismerged = revinfo(c) if r == p1: parent = 1 childcopies = p1copies @@ -319,9 +352,12 @@ } newcopies = copies if childcopies: - newcopies = _chain(newcopies, childcopies) - # _chain makes a copies, we can avoid doing so in some - # simple/linear cases. + newcopies = copies.copy() + for dest, source in pycompat.iteritems(childcopies): + prev = copies.get(source) + if prev is not None and prev[1] is not None: + source = prev[1] + newcopies[dest] = (c, source) assert newcopies is not copies for f in removed: if f in newcopies: @@ -330,7 +366,7 @@ # branches. when there are no other branches, this # could be avoided. newcopies = copies.copy() - del newcopies[f] + newcopies[f] = (c, None) othercopies = all_copies.get(c) if othercopies is None: all_copies[c] = newcopies @@ -338,21 +374,55 @@ # we are the second parent to work on c, we need to merge our # work with the other. # - # Unlike when copies are stored in the filelog, we consider - # it a copy even if the destination already existed on the - # other branch. It's simply too expensive to check if the - # file existed in the manifest. - # # In case of conflict, parent 1 take precedence over parent 2. # This is an arbitrary choice made anew when implementing # changeset based copies. It was made without regards with # potential filelog related behavior. if parent == 1: - othercopies.update(newcopies) + _merge_copies_dict( + othercopies, newcopies, isancestor, ismerged + ) else: - newcopies.update(othercopies) + _merge_copies_dict( + newcopies, othercopies, isancestor, ismerged + ) all_copies[c] = newcopies - return all_copies[targetrev] + + final_copies = {} + for dest, (tt, source) in all_copies[targetrev].items(): + if source is not None: + final_copies[dest] = source + return final_copies + + +def _merge_copies_dict(minor, major, isancestor, ismerged): + """merge two copies-mapping together, minor and major + + In case of conflict, value from "major" will be picked. + + - `isancestors(low_rev, high_rev)`: callable return True if `low_rev` is an + ancestors of `high_rev`, + + - `ismerged(path)`: callable return True if `path` have been merged in the + current revision, + """ + for dest, value in major.items(): + other = minor.get(dest) + if other is None: + minor[dest] = value + else: + new_tt = value[0] + other_tt = other[0] + if value[1] == other[1]: + continue + # content from "major" wins, unless it is older + # than the branch point or there is a merge + if ( + new_tt == other_tt + or not isancestor(new_tt, other_tt) + or ismerged(dest) + ): + minor[dest] = value def _forwardcopies(a, b, base=None, match=None): diff -r f365dfede78f -r 45f3f35cefe7 tests/test-copies-chain-merge.t --- a/tests/test-copies-chain-merge.t Fri Apr 24 15:06:42 2020 -0400 +++ b/tests/test-copies-chain-merge.t Thu Mar 05 17:55:05 2020 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +#testcases filelog compatibility sidedata + ===================================================== Test Copy tracing for chain of copies involving merge ===================================================== @@ -6,6 +8,7 @@ are involved. It cheks we do not have unwanted update of behavior and that the different options to retrieve copies behave correctly. + Setup ===== @@ -18,6 +21,22 @@ > logtemplate={rev} {desc}\n > EOF +#if compatibility + $ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF + > [experimental] + > copies.read-from = compatibility + > EOF +#endif + +#if sidedata + $ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF + > [format] + > exp-use-side-data = yes + > exp-use-copies-side-data-changeset = yes + > EOF +#endif + + $ hg init repo-chain $ cd repo-chain @@ -453,17 +472,26 @@ 0 4 0dd616bc7ab1 000000000000 000000000000 1 10 6da5a2eecb9c 000000000000 000000000000 2 19 eb806e34ef6b 0dd616bc7ab1 6da5a2eecb9c + +# Here the filelog based implementation is not looking at the rename +# information (because the file exist on both side). However the changelog +# based on works fine. We have different output. + $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("a-2")' --rev 'desc("mAEm-0")' M f + b (no-filelog !) R b $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("a-2")' --rev 'desc("mEAm-0")' M f + b (no-filelog !) R b $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("e-2")' --rev 'desc("mAEm-0")' M f + d (no-filelog !) R d $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("e-2")' --rev 'desc("mEAm-0")' M f + d (no-filelog !) R d $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-2")' --rev 'desc("a-2")' A f @@ -473,6 +501,18 @@ A f b R b + +# From here, we run status against revision where both source file exists. +# +# The filelog based implementation picks an arbitrary side based on revision +# numbers. So the same side "wins" whatever the parents order is. This is +# sub-optimal because depending on revision numbers means the result can be +# different from one repository to the next. +# +# The changeset based algorithm use the parent order to break tie on conflicting +# information and will have a different order depending on who is p1 and p2. +# That order is stable accross repositories. (data from p1 prevails) + $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-2")' --rev 'desc("mAEm-0")' A f d @@ -480,7 +520,8 @@ R d $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-2")' --rev 'desc("mEAm-0")' A f - d + d (filelog !) + b (no-filelog !) R b R d $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-0")' --rev 'desc("mAEm-0")' @@ -490,7 +531,8 @@ R b $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-0")' --rev 'desc("mEAm-0")' A f - a + a (filelog !) + b (no-filelog !) R a R b @@ -563,21 +605,25 @@ R h $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("b-1")' --rev 'desc("mBFm-0")' M d + h (no-filelog !) R h $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("f-2")' --rev 'desc("mBFm-0")' M b $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("f-1")' --rev 'desc("mBFm-0")' M b M d + i (no-filelog !) R i $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("b-1")' --rev 'desc("mFBm-0")' M d + h (no-filelog !) R h $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("f-2")' --rev 'desc("mFBm-0")' M b $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("f-1")' --rev 'desc("mFBm-0")' M b M d + i (no-filelog !) R i The following graphlog is wrong, the "a -> c -> d" chain was overwritten and should not appear. @@ -645,9 +691,15 @@ | o 0 i-0 initial commit: a b h +One side of the merge have a long history with rename. The other side of the +merge point to a new file with a smaller history. Each side is "valid". + +(and again the filelog based algorithm only explore one, with a pick based on +revision numbers) + $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-0")' --rev 'desc("mDGm-0")' A d - a + a (filelog !) R a $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-0")' --rev 'desc("mGDm-0")' A d @@ -740,7 +792,8 @@ $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-0")' --rev 'desc("mFGm-0")' A d - a + h (no-filelog !) + a (filelog !) R a R h $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("i-0")' --rev 'desc("mGFm-0")' @@ -754,15 +807,19 @@ M d $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("f-1")' --rev 'desc("mFGm-0")' M d + i (no-filelog !) R i $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("f-1")' --rev 'desc("mGFm-0")' M d + i (no-filelog !) R i $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("g-1")' --rev 'desc("mFGm-0")' M d + h (no-filelog !) R h $ hg status --copies --rev 'desc("g-1")' --rev 'desc("mGFm-0")' M d + h (no-filelog !) R h $ hg log -Gfr 'desc("mFGm-0")' d