Mercurial > hg
changeset 30418:1156ec81f709
util: improve iterfile so it chooses code path wisely
We have performance concerns on "iterfile" as it is 4X slower on normal
files. While modern systems have the nice property that reading a "fast"
(on-disk) file cannot be interrupted and should be made use of.
This patch dumps the related knowledge in comments. And "iterfile" chooses
code paths wisely:
1. If it's CPython 3, or PyPY, use the fast path.
2. If fp is a normal file, use the fast path.
3. If fp is not a normal file and CPython version >= 2.7.4, use the same
workaround (4x slower) as before.
4. If fp is not a normal file and CPython version < 2.7.4, use another
workaround (2x slower but may block longer then necessary) which
basically re-invents the buffer + readline logic in Python.
This will give us good confidence on both correctness and performance
dealing with EINTR in iterfile(fp) for all known supported Python versions.
author | Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:25:51 +0000 |
parents | 854190becacb |
children | 270b077d434b |
files | mercurial/util.py |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/mercurial/util.py Wed Nov 16 23:29:28 2016 -0500 +++ b/mercurial/util.py Tue Nov 15 20:25:51 2016 +0000 @@ -24,10 +24,12 @@ import hashlib import imp import os +import platform as pyplatform import re as remod import shutil import signal import socket +import stat import string import subprocess import sys @@ -2208,10 +2210,77 @@ subsequent_indent=hangindent) return wrapper.fill(line).encode(encoding.encoding) -def iterfile(fp): - """like fp.__iter__ but does not have issues with EINTR. Python 2.7.12 is - known to have such issues.""" - return iter(fp.readline, '') +if (pyplatform.python_implementation() == 'CPython' and + sys.version_info < (3, 0)): + # There is an issue in CPython that some IO methods do not handle EINTR + # correctly. The following table shows what CPython version (and functions) + # are affected (buggy: has the EINTR bug, okay: otherwise): + # + # | < 2.7.4 | 2.7.4 to 2.7.12 | >= 3.0 + # -------------------------------------------------- + # fp.__iter__ | buggy | buggy | okay + # fp.read* | buggy | okay [1] | okay + # + # [1]: fixed by changeset 67dc99a989cd in the cpython hg repo. + # + # Here we workaround the EINTR issue for fileobj.__iter__. Other methods + # like "read*" are ignored for now, as Python < 2.7.4 is a minority. + # + # Although we can workaround the EINTR issue for fp.__iter__, it is slower: + # "for x in fp" is 4x faster than "for x in iter(fp.readline, '')" in + # CPython 2, because CPython 2 maintains an internal readahead buffer for + # fp.__iter__ but not other fp.read* methods. + # + # On modern systems like Linux, the "read" syscall cannot be interrupted + # when reading "fast" files like on-disk files. So the EINTR issue only + # affects things like pipes, sockets, ttys etc. We treat "normal" (S_ISREG) + # files approximately as "fast" files and use the fast (unsafe) code path, + # to minimize the performance impact. + if sys.version_info >= (2, 7, 4): + # fp.readline deals with EINTR correctly, use it as a workaround. + def _safeiterfile(fp): + return iter(fp.readline, '') + else: + # fp.read* are broken too, manually deal with EINTR in a stupid way. + # note: this may block longer than necessary because of bufsize. + def _safeiterfile(fp, bufsize=4096): + fd = fp.fileno() + line = '' + while True: + try: + buf = os.read(fd, bufsize) + except OSError as ex: + # os.read only raises EINTR before any data is read + if ex.errno == errno.EINTR: + continue + else: + raise + line += buf + if '\n' in buf: + splitted = line.splitlines(True) + line = '' + for l in splitted: + if l[-1] == '\n': + yield l + else: + line = l + if not buf: + break + if line: + yield line + + def iterfile(fp): + fastpath = True + if type(fp) is file: + fastpath = stat.S_ISREG(os.fstat(fp.fileno()).st_mode) + if fastpath: + return fp + else: + return _safeiterfile(fp) +else: + # PyPy and CPython 3 do not have the EINTR issue thus no workaround needed. + def iterfile(fp): + return fp def iterlines(iterator): for chunk in iterator: