Mercurial > hg
changeset 59:2bff7c0ea1d3
Minor corrections
| author | mpm@selenic.com |
|---|---|
| date | Thu, 12 May 2005 01:20:43 -0800 |
| parents | 2ab801e0ea9f |
| children | e32fdbd97839 |
| files | notes.txt |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/notes.txt Thu May 12 01:20:16 2005 -0800 +++ b/notes.txt Thu May 12 01:20:43 2005 -0800 @@ -149,10 +149,10 @@ it to be much more bandwidth efficient. I expect repos sizes and sync speeds to be similar to or better than BK, given the use of binary diffs. -Mercurial is roughly the same performance as git and is faster in -others as it keeps around more metadata. One example is listing and -retrieving past versions of a file, which it can do without reading -all the changesets. This metadata will also allow it to perform better -merges as described above. +Mercurial is roughly the same performance as git in some areas and is +faster in others as it keeps around more metadata. One example is +listing and retrieving past versions of a file, which it can do +without reading all the changesets. This metadata will also allow it +to perform better merges as described above.