Mercurial > hg
changeset 26285:91cad8eb7951
bookmark: actually test update behavior in both cases
The test claimed to test pull --update behaved the same way as pull + update,
but the behavior of pull + update was never tested.
We now test both.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:17:54 -0700 |
parents | c258f4d2bfb2 |
children | 4b685712fa45 |
files | tests/test-bookmarks.t |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/tests/test-bookmarks.t Fri Sep 18 14:03:32 2015 +0800 +++ b/tests/test-bookmarks.t Thu Sep 17 17:17:54 2015 -0700 @@ -569,6 +569,30 @@ $ hg bookmark -r3 Y moving bookmark 'Y' forward from db815d6d32e6 + $ cp -r ../cloned-bookmarks-update ../cloned-bookmarks-manual-update + +(manual version) + + $ hg -R ../cloned-bookmarks-manual-update update Y + 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved + (activating bookmark Y) + $ hg -R ../cloned-bookmarks-manual-update pull . + pulling from . + searching for changes + adding changesets + adding manifests + adding file changes + added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) + updating bookmark Y + updating bookmark Z + (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge) + $ hg -R ../cloned-bookmarks-manual-update update + updating to active bookmark Y + 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved + (activating bookmark Y) + +(all in one version) + $ hg -R ../cloned-bookmarks-update update Y 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (activating bookmark Y)