fix: determine fixer tool failure by exit code instead of stderr

fix: determine fixer tool failure by exit code instead of stderr

This seems like the more natural thing, and it probably should have been this
way to beign with. It is more flexible because it allows tools to emit
diagnostic information while also modifying a file. An example would be an
automatic code formatter that also prints any remaining lint issues.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4158

--- a/hgext/fix.py	Thu Aug 09 13:13:09 2018 +0300
+++ b/hgext/fix.py	Tue Aug 07 21:15:27 2018 -0700
@@ -435,6 +435,9 @@
     starting with the file's content in the fixctx. Fixers that support line
     ranges will affect lines that have changed relative to any of the basectxs
     (i.e. they will only avoid lines that are common to all basectxs).
+
+    A fixer tool's stdout will become the file's new content if and only if it
+    exits with code zero.
     """
     newdata = fixctx[path].data()
     for fixername, fixer in fixers.iteritems():
@@ -454,8 +457,11 @@
             newerdata, stderr = proc.communicate(newdata)
             if stderr:
                 showstderr(ui, fixctx.rev(), fixername, stderr)
-            else:
+            if proc.returncode == 0:
                 newdata = newerdata
+            elif not stderr:
+                showstderr(ui, fixctx.rev(), fixername,
+                           _('exited with status %d\n') % (proc.returncode,))
     return newdata
 
 def showstderr(ui, rev, fixername, stderr):

--- a/tests/test-fix.t	Thu Aug 09 13:13:09 2018 +0300
+++ b/tests/test-fix.t	Tue Aug 07 21:15:27 2018 -0700
@@ -502,12 +502,13 @@
 
   $ cd ..
 
-When a fixer prints to stderr, we assume that it has failed. We should show the
-error messages to the user, and we should not let the failing fixer affect the
-file it was fixing (many code formatters might emit error messages on stderr
-and nothing on stdout, which would cause us the clear the file). We show the
-user which fixer failed and which revision, but we assume that the fixer will
-print the filename if it is relevant.
+When a fixer prints to stderr, we don't assume that it has failed. We show the
+error messages to the user, and we still let the fixer affect the file it was
+fixing if its exit code is zero. Some code formatters might emit error messages
+on stderr and nothing on stdout, which would cause us the clear the file,
+except that they also exit with a non-zero code. We show the user which fixer
+emitted the stderr, and which revision, but we assume that the fixer will print
+the filename if it is relevant (since the issue may be non-specific).
 
   $ hg init showstderr
   $ cd showstderr
@@ -515,17 +516,37 @@
   $ printf "hello\n" > hello.txt
   $ hg add
   adding hello.txt
-  $ cat >> $TESTTMP/cmd.sh <<'EOF'
+  $ cat > $TESTTMP/fail.sh <<'EOF'
   > printf 'HELLO\n'
   > printf "$@: some\nerror" >&2
+  > exit 0 # success despite the stderr output
   > EOF
-  $ hg --config "fix.fail:command=sh $TESTTMP/cmd.sh {rootpath}" \
+  $ hg --config "fix.fail:command=sh $TESTTMP/fail.sh {rootpath}" \
   >    --config "fix.fail:fileset=hello.txt" \
   >    fix --working-dir
   [wdir] fail: hello.txt: some
   [wdir] fail: error
   $ cat hello.txt
-  hello
+  HELLO
+
+  $ printf "goodbye\n" > hello.txt
+  $ cat > $TESTTMP/work.sh <<'EOF'
+  > printf 'GOODBYE\n'
+  > printf "$@: some\nerror\n" >&2
+  > exit 42 # success despite the stdout output
+  > EOF
+  $ hg --config "fix.fail:command=sh $TESTTMP/work.sh {rootpath}" \
+  >    --config "fix.fail:fileset=hello.txt" \
+  >    fix --working-dir
+  [wdir] fail: hello.txt: some
+  [wdir] fail: error
+  $ cat hello.txt
+  goodbye
+
+  $ hg --config "fix.fail:command=exit 42" \
+  >    --config "fix.fail:fileset=hello.txt" \
+  >    fix --working-dir
+  [wdir] fail: exited with status 42
 
   $ cd ..