Mercurial > hg
changeset 3113:d1d1cd5b9484
merge: eliminate confusing queued variable
author | Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:53:19 -0500 |
parents | f96c8e219865 |
children | c4e26f1ccfcc |
files | mercurial/merge.py |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/mercurial/merge.py Sun Sep 17 18:28:50 2006 -0500 +++ b/mercurial/merge.py Sun Sep 17 19:53:19 2006 -0500 @@ -116,8 +116,6 @@ # Compare manifests for f, n in m1.iteritems(): if f in m2: - queued = 0 - # are files different? if n != m2[f]: a = ma.get(f, nullid) @@ -125,25 +123,28 @@ if not overwrite and n != a and m2[f] != a: ui.debug(_(" %s versions differ, resolve\n") % f) action.append((f, "m", fmerge(f, m1, m2, ma), n[:20], m2[f])) - queued = 1 # are we clobbering? # is remote's version newer? # or are we going back in time and clean? elif overwrite or m2[f] != a or (backwards and not n[20:]): ui.debug(_(" remote %s is newer, get\n") % f) action.append((f, "g", m2.execf(f), m2[f])) - queued = 1 + # local is newer, not overwrite, check mode bits + elif m1.execf(f) != m2.execf(f): + mode = fmerge(f, m1, m2, ma) + if mode != m1.execf(f): + ui.debug(_(" updating permissions for %s\n") % f) + action.append((f, "e", m2.execf(f))) - # do we still need to look at mode bits? - if not queued and m1.execf(f) != m2.execf(f): + # contents same, check mode bits + elif m1.execf(f) != m2.execf(f): if overwrite: ui.debug(_(" updating permissions for %s\n") % f) action.append((f, "e", m2.execf(f))) else: mode = fmerge(f, m1, m2, ma) if mode != m1.execf(f): - ui.debug(_(" updating permissions for %s\n") - % f) + ui.debug(_(" updating permissions for %s\n") % f) action.append((f, "e", m2.execf(f))) del m2[f] elif f in ma: