view tests/test-evolve-content-divergent-case-A1.t @ 6935:954d7ea5cd67 stable tip

stack: when stack base is obsolete, pick any successor, even if at random There are situations when s0 is obsolete and we also cannot pick just one successor for it to use in stack. In such a case, let's pick the "latest" successor from the first set. We're assuming that obsutil.successorssets() returns data in the same order (it should, since it makes sure to sort data internally). Keeping that in mind, while the successor picked for s0 by this code is not based on any sort of sophisticated logic, it should nonetheless be the same every time. This patch is probably not going to completely break anything that was previously working fine, because the previous behavior was to just abort with an exception.
author Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net>
date Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:01:02 +0400
parents 8c3656505d4d
children
line wrap: on
line source

===============================================
Testing content-divergence resolution: Case A.1
===============================================

Independent rewrites of same changeset can lead to content-divergence. In most
common cases, it can occur when multiple users rewrite the same changeset
independently and push it.

This test belongs to a series of tests checking the resolution of content-divergent
changesets.

Category A: no parents are obsolete
Testcase 1: no conflict: independent metadata changes only

A.1 No content changes on any side
==================================

.. (Divergence reason):
..    local: changed the description of changeset
..    other: changed the date of changeset
.. Where we show that since there is no content change in divergent changesets
.. we should only merge the metadata of changesets in a 3-way merge
..
.. (local):
..
..   A ø⇠○ A'
..     |/
..     ● O
..
.. (other):
..
..   A ø⇠○ A''
..     |/
..     ● O
..
.. (Resolution):
..
..     ○ A'''
..     |
..     ● O
..

Setup
-----
  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/content-divergence-util.sh
  $ setuprepos A.1
  creating test repo for test case A.1
  - upstream
  - local
  - other
  cd into `local` and proceed with env setup

initial

  $ cd local
  $ mkcommit A0
  $ hg push -q
  $ hg amend -m "A1"
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  2:0d8c87cec5fc (draft): A1
  |
  | x  1:28b51eb45704 (draft): A0
  |/
  o  0:a9bdc8b26820 (public): O
  
  $ cd ../other
  $ hg pull -uq
  $ hg amend -d '0 1'
  $ hg push -q

  $ cd ../local
  $ hg pull -q
  2 new content-divergent changesets

Actual test of resolution
-------------------------
  $ hg evolve -l
  0d8c87cec5fc: A1
    content-divergent: ece7459c388a (draft) (precursor 28b51eb45704)
  
  ece7459c388a: A0
    content-divergent: 0d8c87cec5fc (draft) (precursor 28b51eb45704)
  
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  *  3:ece7459c388a (draft): A0 [content-divergent]
  |
  | @  2:0d8c87cec5fc (draft): A1 [content-divergent]
  |/
  | x  1:28b51eb45704 (draft): A0
  |/
  o  0:a9bdc8b26820 (public): O
  

  $ hg evolve --content-divergent
  merge:[2] A1
  with: [3] A0
  base: [1] A0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  working directory is now at 36c6c1f70ad9

  $ hg log -G
  @  4:36c6c1f70ad9 (draft): A1
  |
  o  0:a9bdc8b26820 (public): O
  
  $ hg evolve -l