Mercurial > evolve
changeset 4619:93514c421528
docs: change `troubled` references to `unstable`
Per https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/CEDVocabulary
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 27 Apr 2019 21:27:54 -0400 |
parents | 803d32f4e498 |
children | a05bfdf372fb |
files | docs/concepts.rst docs/obs-terms.rst docs/sharing.rst docs/tutorial/slides.md |
diffstat | 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/docs/concepts.rst Sat Apr 27 21:24:18 2019 -0400 +++ b/docs/concepts.rst Sat Apr 27 21:27:54 2019 -0400 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ think of the traditional parent/child DAG as the first derivative of your source code, and the obsolescence DAG as the second derivative.) -Troubled changesets (orphan, bumped, divergent) +Unstable changesets (orphan, bumped, divergent) ----------------------------------------------- Evolving history can introduce problems that need to be solved. For @@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ public phase; only mutable changesets are divergent). The collective term for orphan, bumped, and divergent changeset is -*troubled*:: +*unstable*:: - troubled = orphan ∪ bumped ∪ divergent + unstable = orphan ∪ bumped ∪ divergent -It is possible for a changeset to be in any of the troubled categories +It is possible for a changeset to be in any of the unstable categories at the same time: it might be an orphan and divergent, or bumped and divergent, or whatever. - [diagram: Venn diagram of troubled changesets, showing overlap] + [diagram: Venn diagram of unstable changesets, showing overlap] -The presence of troubled changesets indicates the need to run ``hg +The presence of unstable changesets indicates the need to run ``hg evolve``. Hidden (and visible) changesets @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ hidden = hideable ∖ ancestors((repo ∖ hideable) ∪ blockers) This will probably be clearer with a worked example. First, here's a -repository with some obsolete changesets, some troubled changesets, +repository with some obsolete changesets, some unstable changesets, one bookmark, a working copy, and some hidden changesets:: x-x
--- a/docs/obs-terms.rst Sat Apr 27 21:24:18 2019 -0400 +++ b/docs/obs-terms.rst Sat Apr 27 21:27:54 2019 -0400 @@ -92,16 +92,16 @@ | | | | | +--------------------------+-----------------------------+ | | | | -| | **troubled** | **orphan** | +| | **unstable** | **orphan** | | | | | -| | *troubled* has | *orphan* is a changeset | +| | *unstable* has | *orphan* is a changeset | | | unresolved issue caused | with obsolete ancestors. | | | by *obsolete* relations. | | | | | | | | Possible issues are | It must be rebased on a | -| | listed in the next | non *troubled* base to | +| | listed in the next | non *unstable* base to | | | column. It is possible | solve the problem. | -| | for *troubled* | | +| | for *unstable* | | | | changeset to combine | (possible alternative name: | | | multiple issue at once. | precarious) | | | (a.k.a. divergent and | | @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ | +--------------------------+-----------------------------+ | | | | | Mutable changesets which are neither *obsolete* or | -| | *troubled* are *"ok"*. | +| | *unstable* are *"ok"*. | | | | | | Do we really need a name for it ? *"ok"* is a pretty | | | crappy name :-/ other possibilities are: |
--- a/docs/sharing.rst Sat Apr 27 21:24:18 2019 -0400 +++ b/docs/sharing.rst Sat Apr 27 21:27:54 2019 -0400 @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ with a spoon?) In the user guide, we saw examples of *orphan* changesets, which are -the most common type of troubled changeset. (Recall that a +the most common type of unstable changeset. (Recall that a non-obsolete changeset with obsolete ancestors is an orphan.) Two other types of instability can happen: *divergent* and @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ 2:e011 is now public, so it can't be obsolete. When that changeset was obsolete, it made perfect sense for it to have a successor, namely Bob's amendment of Alice's fix (changeset 4:fe88). But it's illogical -for a public changeset to have a successor, so 4:fe88 is troubled: +for a public changeset to have a successor, so 4:fe88 is unstable: it has become *bumped*. [figure SG07: 2:e011 now public not obsolete, 4:fe88 now bumped] @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ changeset 5:227d—albeit with a software-generated commit message. (Bob should probably amend that changeset to improve the commit message.) But the important thing is that his repository no longer has any -troubled changesets, thanks to ``evolve``. +unstable changesets, thanks to ``evolve``. [figure SG08: 5:227d is new, formerly bumped changeset 4:fe88 now hidden] @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ dull knife (never mind a rusty spoon). At the same time, an inattentive or careless user can do harm to himself or others. Mercurial with ``evolve`` goes to great lengths to limit the harm you -can do by trying to handle all possible types of “troubled” +can do by trying to handle all possible types of “unstable” changesets. Nevertheless, having a first-aid kit nearby does not mean you should stop being careful with sharp knives.
--- a/docs/tutorial/slides.md Sat Apr 27 21:24:18 2019 -0400 +++ b/docs/tutorial/slides.md Sat Apr 27 21:27:54 2019 -0400 @@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ split (on branch: default, 1 changesets, <span style="color:teal;">492 behind</span>) stack_orphan_bug (on branch: default, 1 changesets, <span style="color:teal;">474 behind</span>) tutorial (on branch: default, 2 changesets, <span style="color:teal;">492 behind</span>) -<span style="color:green;"> * </span><span style="color:green;">tutorialtypos </span> (on branch: default, 3 changesets, <span style="color:red;">1 troubled</span>, <span style="color:olive;">2 heads</span>, <span style="color:teal;">2 behind</span>) +<span style="color:green;"> * </span><span style="color:green;">tutorialtypos </span> (on branch: default, 3 changesets, <span style="color:red;">1 unstable</span>, <span style="color:olive;">2 heads</span>, <span style="color:teal;">2 behind</span>) </pre> #### Log