Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:19:18 +0900 tests: use "%HG_ARGS%" in shell alias on Windows instead of "$HG_ARGS" stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:19:18 +0900] rev 23093
tests: use "%HG_ARGS%" in shell alias on Windows instead of "$HG_ARGS" Before this patch, a part of "test-alias.t" fails unexpectedly on Windows environment, because "cmd.exe" can't evaluate "$HG_ARGS" expression in shell alias correctly. This patch uses "%HG_ARGS%" in shell alias on Windows instead of "$HG_ARGS" to expand it correctly.
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:19:18 +0900 tests: introduce "checkeditform-n-cat.sh" script to invoke "cat" in it safely stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:19:18 +0900] rev 23092
tests: introduce "checkeditform-n-cat.sh" script to invoke "cat" in it safely Before this patch, a part of "test-transplant.t" fails unexpectedly on Windows environment, because semicolon (";") in HGEDITOR isn't recognized as the command separator by "cmd.exe". This patch newly introduces "checkeditform-n-cat.sh" script to invoke "cat" in it safely anywhere.
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:50:00 -0400 doc: change 'revision or range' to 'revision or revset' stable
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:50:00 -0400] rev 23091
doc: change 'revision or range' to 'revision or revset' The phrase "revision or range" comes from a pre-revset era. Since the documentation for ranges now is under the revset docs, and as a helpful hint nudging users towards revsets, I think it's better to say "revision or revset"
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:14:12 +0900 largefiles: add examination of exec bit in "hg status --rev REV" case stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:14:12 +0900] rev 23090
largefiles: add examination of exec bit in "hg status --rev REV" case Before this patch, "hg status --rev REV" doesn't list largefiles up with "M" mark, even if exec bit of them is changed, because "lfilesrepo.status" doesn't examine exec bit in such case.
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:14:11 +0900 largefiles: ignore removal status of files not managed in the target context stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:14:11 +0900] rev 23089
largefiles: ignore removal status of files not managed in the target context Before this patch, "hg status --rev REV" listed largefiles removed in the working directory up with "R" mark, even if they aren't managed in the REV. Normal files aren't listed up in such case. When "lfilesrepo.status" is invoked for "hg status --rev REV", it treats files on conditions below as "removed" (to avoid manifest full scan in "ctx.status" ?): - marked as "R" in lfdirstate, or - files managed in the target revision but unknown in the manifest of the working context (= not including "R" files) But the former can include files not managed in the target context. To ignore removal status of files not managed in the target context, this patch drops files unknown in the target revision from "removed" list.
Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:14:12 +0100 changelog: use headrevsfiltered stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:14:12 +0100] rev 23088
changelog: use headrevsfiltered 2b5940f64750 introduced use of the new filtering headrevs C implementation. It caught TypeError to detect when to fall back to the implementation that was compatible with old extensions. That method was however not reliable. Instead, use the new headrevsfiltered function when passing a filter. It will reliably fail with AttributeError when an old extension that predates headrevsfiltered is used.
Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:14:10 +0100 parsers: introduce headrevsfiltered in C extension stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:14:10 +0100] rev 23087
parsers: introduce headrevsfiltered in C extension All extensions that have this function do support filtering. The existing headrevs function may support filtering but we cannot reliably detect whether it does.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip